Thursday, October 13

A Consensus Horizion Goal?


Space News Magazine asked the two presidential candidates about the space program and Mars.  Trump provided short, noncommittal responses, whereas Clinton said more but still did not make any big leaps.  Here is her statement on Mars:
Today, thanks to decades of successful American robotic explorers, we know more about the universe than ever before. We have learned that asteroids have shaped life on our home planet and will likely affect our future. Their scientific value and their potential as a resource make them valuable targets for further exploration. Many of the technologies we need to send astronauts to an asteroid can also serve as foundational technologies that will be necessary to make human exploration of Mars possible. 
While President Kennedy set NASA on a course to win the race against Russia to get to the moon, today, human spaceflight is a global endeavor, with astronauts and cosmonauts living and working together on the International Space Station — a remarkable facility developed with 15 international partners. America should continue to push the boundaries of space and lead a global effort of exploration.
I have always been an enthusiastic supporter of human space flight. My administration will continue to invest in this worthwhile endeavor. Mars is a consensus horizon goal, though to send humans safely, we still need to advance the technologies required to mitigate the effects of long-duration, deep-space flight.
Clinton certainly has more information in her response, but no real actionable goals.  And it depends what we want to "mitigate."  Set the bar too high and even the Moon is too far for us. 
I guess we cannot expect much more until after the election. However, if the current campaign "topics" continue into the presidency it may be hard to get any leadership on this issue in the future as well.